Which of the following actions could help mitigate problems identified in an AS-IS process?

Changing the sequence in which the process is carried out is a strategic action that can significantly improve the effectiveness and efficiency of an AS-IS process. By adjusting the order of tasks, you can often identify bottlenecks or redundancies that may exist in the current workflow. This re-sequencing can help streamline operations, reduce delays, and enhance the overall flow of the process, leading to better outcomes.

When analyzing an AS-IS process, it is common to uncover inefficiencies or areas for improvement. Altering the sequence of tasks allows for a fresh look at the process and can lead to a solution that balances workloads more appropriately or aligns tasks in a way that enhances collaboration and supports the end goals.

In contrast, changing staff responsible for the process, increasing the budget for resources, or implementing stricter controls may not necessarily address the underlying inefficiencies or issues present in an AS-IS model. These approaches can sometimes lead to superficial changes or unintended consequences without creating the foundational improvements that a reevaluation of the process sequence would provide.